Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Help: , Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <99B82AA9708ED0119B55006097125A001E5FF2@ifk63.mach.uni-karlsruhe.de> From: Heribert Dahms To: "'Chris Faylor'" Subject: RE: size_of_stack_reserve SEGV Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 23:55:04 +0200 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3) Content-Type: text/plain Hi Chris, oh, I got it! My point is that under Unix, analyzing the complete core file may save hours needed for rerunning from the very beginning under gdb. I also understand that nobody has yet contributed core file support as expected from Unix. Sorry, I've not the time... Bye, Heribert (heribert_dahms AT icon-gmbh DOT de) > -----Original Message----- > From: 'Chris Faylor' [SMTP:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com] > Sent: Sunday, August 01, 1999 02:04 > To: Heribert Dahms > Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > Subject: Re: size_of_stack_reserve SEGV > > On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 02:00:25AM +0200, Heribert Dahms wrote: > >Hi Chris, > > > >exactly like under Unix? > >Does "gdb foo core" work now as expected? > > I didn't say to do 'gdb foo core'. I said: > > "Run. Your. Program." > > That would be: > > gdb foo > run > > Got it? It's really really simple. > > cgf > > [Heribert] [snip] > -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com