Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>,
	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 23:40:04 -0400
To: JSONCRAIG AT aol DOT com
Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: Simple license question
Message-ID: <19990801234004.A19311@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References: <7aa87d1a DOT 24d5ef62 AT aol DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i
In-Reply-To: <7aa87d1a.24d5ef62@aol.com>; from JSONCRAIG@aol.com on Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 02:43:46PM -0400

On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 02:43:46PM -0400, JSONCRAIG AT aol DOT com wrote:
>I'm going to be using a third-party API that uses .lib files for static 
>linking.  Does using Coling Peter's impdef to build .a libraries count as 
>reverse-compiling or reverse-assembling of the .lib files?

I don't see why it would.  If I understand what impdef does, it is just
exposing functions in the DLL which are meant to be used by other
programs.

cgf
(Who is not a lawyer)

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com