Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: "Reza Habib" <reza AT psych DOT utoronto DOT ca>
To: "Cygwin Mailing List" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: optimization
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:23:04 -0400
Message-ID: <000301becc8b$3366ad00$788a94d1@newton>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

Hi.  Can someone tell me how well the code generated by borland c++builder,
microsoft visual c++, and metrowerks codewarrior (and any other windows
compilers) compares to the code generated by egcs-1.1.2 with respect to
floating point performance (my main development platform is windows).  I'm
in the process of writing some statistical tools for image analysis.  My
data are in floating point and I will mainly be conducting matrix algebra
type operations.  I'm trying to pick the compiler which will produce the
fastest,  most efficient code.  Thanks.

Reza


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com