Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id: <199906181431.JAA00479@mercury.xraylith.wisc.edu>
To: Richard Hickling <hicklinr AT mcd DOT alcatel DOT be>
cc: "cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: gcc -print-prog-name=ld with mingw32 binaries 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Jun 1999 09:52:10 +0200."
             <3769FAAA DOT 2CA02B77 AT mcd DOT alcatel DOT be> 
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 09:31:21 -0500
From: Mumit Khan <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU>

Richard Hickling <hicklinr AT mcd DOT alcatel DOT be> writes:
> 'gcc -print-prog-name=ld' produces just 'ld' with
> the mingw32 binaries (whereas with the cygwin
> binaries the full path-name + .exe is produced).
> I guess it should be consistent one way or the
> other.

I on the other hand see no inconsistency. I have other systems, albeit 
without GNU as and GNU ld, where it does the same thing.

If you really want it that way for some reason, do the following at the
expense of disks space:
  
  $ cd /egcs-1.1.2/i386-mingw32
  $ mkdir bin
  $ cd bin
  $ cd /egcs-1.1.2/bin/{as,ld} .

Now it'll do what you want. I won't do this in the distributions; these
are large enough as it is.

Mumit


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com