Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id: <3765B4E0.9F864D52@kiwi.iamp.tohoku.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 03:05:20 +0000
From: Samy Alex ZAIMI <zaimi AT kiwi DOT iamp DOT tohoku DOT ac DOT jp>
Reply-To: zaimi AT kiwi DOT iamp DOT tohoku DOT ac DOT jp
Organization: Institute for Advanced Materials Processing - Tohoku University
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [fr] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: fr,en,ja
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: new cygwin.dll (was Re: Make problems)
References: <847a8087 DOT 24965337 AT aol DOT com> <19990614180700 DOT A3064 AT cygnus DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id VAA03735

By the way, I noticed that new cygwin.dll snapshots modify a bit the registry
organisation compared to e.g. 15 january's snapshot, especially the mount
organisation. 'fsilent' key has disappeared (BTW, what was that for ?). The problem
is that this new structure is obviously not recognized by former snapshots, so if
one wants to use the old snapshot again one has to remove the registries created by
the new snapshot in regedit, otherwise mount command won't work anymore.
Any comment on that ?
Is this new registry organisation stable in time ?
In other words, is it planed to change or evolve in the future ?
--
SAZ

Chris Faylor a écrit :

> On Mon, Jun 14, 1999 at 08:44:39AM -0400, N8TM AT aol DOT com wrote:
> >In a message dated 99-06-14 04:54:50 EDT, borkhuis AT xs4all DOT nl writes:
> >
> ><< Which snapshot is stable enough to use it? I saw some notes about jan.
> > 15 snapshot, but nothing about any newer snapshots. >>
> >The June 3 snapshot has been working for me, on both W95 and W2K.  That's the
> >last uncorrupted snapshot on the go.cygnus.com mirror.
> I have no idea what a "corrupted snapshot" might be but when I suggested using
> a newer snapshot, I meant trying one of the ones that have come out in the last
> few days.





--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com