Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: "Reza Habib" <reza AT psych DOT utoronto DOT ca>
To: <gwardar AT studbox DOT uni-stuttgart DOT de>, <opendx-general AT watson DOT ibm DOT com>
Cc: <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: RE: [opendx-general] X-Server for Win9x platform - Where from; how much?
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 13:25:29 -0400
Message-ID: <000601beb10a$bd4493d0$f28f94d1@newton>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <01BEB119.4C48F0E0.gwardar@studbox.uni-stuttgart.de>
Importance: Normal

The problem which exists on win95 also exists on nt4.  I compiled dx and
couldn't get it to run under the free x server MIX/Server on nt4.  I don't
think exceed from Hummingbird is too expensive (a couple of hundred) and I
believe it runs on both windows 95 and nt 4.  I imagine opendx will work
with it, but won't know till I try it out sometime tomorrow.  I'll send a
report to the list.

Reza


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com]On Behalf Of Martin Kaim
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 1:08 PM
> To: 'opendx-general AT watson DOT ibm DOT com'
> Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> Subject: [opendx-general] X-Server for Win9x platform - Where from; how
> much?
>
>
> Hello DX-users on Win32/Cygwin platforms,
>
> thanks to S. Siddiqi's and others' efforts, only a few days after
> DX went open source, there already
> is a (precompiled binaries) Win32 version of DX4.0.1 available
> for d/l, which by itself is a Good Thing.
>
> Also, there are Cygwin-B20.1, EGCS-1.1.2, X11R6.4/LessTif 0.88.x
> and Mesa-3.0 for Cygwin
> packages out there so everything needed to build DX by oneself is
> on the Web. So far, so fine.
>
> But... having wondered for some time why I couldn't even get the
> precompiled DX release (from a previous d/l) to run
> under Win95/Cygwin (that is, using its GUI), I was shocked to
> read the following lines in the readme accompanying
> the DX4.0.1-binary distribution mentioned in the original message
> included below (thank God I read this before
> attempting to download ~37MB that would probably not have worked for me):
>
> Quoting from the readme:
>
> >  [...] You need a X11R6.3 compliant X server.  At the moment no
> >  free X11R6.x compliant servers are available.  Do not waste your time
> >  trying the freeware MI/X server.  It is X11R5 compliant and will not
> >  work. [...]
> >  First start the X-server. Then, open a DOS Shell [...]
>
> So, if I understand this correctly, there is no way of running DX
> *with its GUI* for
> those Win9x users who don't possess a working
> X11R6.3..6.4-compliant X-server.
>
> This, AFAIK, applies to virtually all of the Win9x-out of the
> box- user base,
> and is IMHO also the worst case scenario for any potential
> DX-users on those platforms-
> DX is pretty useless *without its GUI*, right?!
>
> As all the packages needed for DX on a Win9x-platform are open
> source/freeware/GPLed software/
> public domain, I would of course be willing to pay a *moderate*
> amount for an X-server license.
> However, commercial UNIX packages are not always reasonably
> priced... or are they?
>
> Is there any inexpensive remedy? Do I have to shell out lots of
> $$ for WinNT4.0
> (where there presumably are commercial X server packages, which
> probably won't be very affordable
> either) or what else can I do?
>
> If you know of any working solutions (first-hand experience
> preferred) under Win9x/Cygwin, please
> mail me or *better: post it to the opendx-general list* as this
> question will most certainly reappear more than once
> as the OpenDX audience grows.
>
> Any posting should contain product name/release version/date,
> company/vendor, price (single-user license),
> where to get it (USA/Europe) (like address, web site, phone no.
> of retailer, ... whatever you may have)
> and a short comment on pros and cons
> (like stability, performance, hw/sw requirements, ease of use,
> degree of compliance to the X APIs,
> (un)supported features, ...)
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Martin.
>
mailto://thedarkglows AT geocities DOT com


Original message follows:

Von:	Suhaib M. Siddiqi [SMTP:Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com]
Gesendet am:	Montag, 7. Juni 1999 14:35
An:	opendx-general AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
Cc:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Betreff:	[opendx-general] OpenDX Windoz

I have updated OpenDX binaries for Cygwin/Windows at:

http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Forum/6298/

The new binaries have cdf,hdf and netcdf support.  The startup scripts had
been fixed.
Please read the README.TXT, after extracting the archive.

Suhaib


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com