Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <19990603181016.1485.rocketmail@web135.yahoomail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 11:10:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com Subject: Re: various 'cywin1.dll' tested with PERL's 'Configure' script. To: cygwin users MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Glenn Spell wrote: -8<- > > Why do we need ash anyway - what's the trouble with using just bash as > sh? I tried using ash several times on my Linux boot floppies to save > space, but I always concluded it wasn't worth the trouble, bash is just > so much better even for noninteractive use. Instead I saved space by > not including any executables that had a corresponding bash built-in, > and rewriting several others as scripts. Bash is a heavyweight and slows down processing. Ash was included only beginning with b19. So, you can do as you did if you don't need the processing speed. Personally I prefer having the extra speed from the lighter ash package. === YAWIA, Earnie Boyd Newbies, please visit _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com