Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <003e01be6db2$06c73f40$41cd78cf@hunda>
From: "Suhaib M. Siddiqi" <Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com>
To: <hcobb AT telegenisys DOT com>
Cc: <dpainter AT lightspeed DOT net>, <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: Which command to bump when M$ is non-posixish
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:31:37 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3


I have no idea!

I have never gotten any conflicts betweeb the X.exe which have common names
under Windows and Cygwin.

At my end it happens only, if I intentionally include C:\WinNT
in PATH in cygnus.bat or .bashrc.

Of course everyone has his/her own requirements and preferences, therefore
he/she must decide what is best for him/her.




>There are a few places where X.exe exists both as a WinDos builtin and a
>standard GNU command installed with Cygwin.
>
>Now, one of the commands can be renamed (or deleted ;-) or the path can be
>set to choose one over the other (most of the time, for the Dos prompt).
>
>My requirement is that a WinDos machine with Cygwin installed function
>first as a Windos platform PC then as a DOS machine and lastly as a Posix
>machine.  (When I feel the need for speed or whatever, I reboot to
Linux...)
>
>Therefore I leave cygwin at the end and move the parts I need to
>non-blocked names.
>
>Does anybody think that Cygwin should install itself at the front of the
>Path environment variable?
>
>
>--
>Want to unsubscribe from this list?
>Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
>
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com