Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:26:33 -0500 Message-Id: <199903140026.TAA28770@delorie.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: "Henry J. Cobb" To: Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com CC: dpainter AT lightspeed DOT net, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com In-reply-to: <003301be6daf$950045c0$41cd78cf@hunda> (Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com) Subject: Which command to bump when M$ is non-posixish Reply-to: hcobb AT telegenisys DOT com References: <003301be6daf$950045c0$41cd78cf AT hunda> There are a few places where X.exe exists both as a WinDos builtin and a standard GNU command installed with Cygwin. Now, one of the commands can be renamed (or deleted ;-) or the path can be set to choose one over the other (most of the time, for the Dos prompt). My requirement is that a WinDos machine with Cygwin installed function first as a Windos platform PC then as a DOS machine and lastly as a Posix machine. (When I feel the need for speed or whatever, I reboot to Linux...) Therefore I leave cygwin at the end and move the parts I need to non-blocked names. Does anybody think that Cygwin should install itself at the front of the Path environment variable? -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com