Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id: <199903111508.JAA27393@modi.xraylith.wisc.edu>
X-Authentication-Warning: modi.xraylith.wisc.edu: localhost.xraylith.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: Anders Norlander <anorland AT hem2 DOT passagen DOT se>
cc: Jonathan Pryor <jonpryor AT vt DOT edu>,
        Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: Compiled executable differences between 9x and NT 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:02:20 +0100."
             <36E7DAFC DOT 7D1AE3AC AT hem2 DOT passagen DOT se> 
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:08:26 -0600
From: Mumit Khan <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU>

Anders Norlander <anorland AT hem2 DOT passagen DOT se> writes:
> 
> I have a w95 system (haven't tested on NT) similar to yours (4.00.950 B
> and IE 4.0 xx) and it crashes for me as well.
> 
> This suggests that there might be some problem with this setup
> or it could be something completely different.
> 

Could someone test it on a Win95 B (I know it works on Win95 A) *without*
IE 4.0 and see if it still works? I wonder if IE is the deciding factor
here.

Regards,
Mumit


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com