Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <19990310111253.60943@murlibobo.cs.mu.OZ.AU> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:12:53 +1100 From: Fergus Henderson To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: text vs binary mode yet again References: <4798-Tue09Mar1999190417+0100-vzell AT de DOT oracle DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <4798-Tue09Mar1999190417+0100-vzell@de.oracle.com>; from Dr. Volker Zell on Tue, Mar 09, 1999 at 07:04:17PM +0100 On 09-Mar-1999, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > > >> Re text/binary: NOTEPAD is not a text editor. It is a > >> bug. NOTEPAD compatibility is not a valid concern. Seriously! > > >> Why hang on to ancient conventions such as the distinction > >> between binary and text mode? Why hang on to ^&%$&%$ operating systems like Windows? If you're using cygwin at all, it's presumably because compatibility with existing software is of some concern. Otherwise, just use Linux! > >> Why should I want to open a file in 'text' mode? What if I run > >> a cygwin application to write a 'text' file that is part of a > >> MacOS application? I need three different record separators, > >> and I can't infer which to use just from what OS the > >> application is running on. BTW, this is an actual example of > >> what I use cygwin tools for. In that particular case, you wouldn't want to open the file in text mode. But there are plenty of other cases where text mode does make sense. -- Fergus Henderson | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger fjh AT 128 DOT 250 DOT 37 DOT 3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com