Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 13:27:10 -0500
Message-Id: <199903081827.NAA01386@delorie.com>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: "Henry J. Cobb" <hcobb AT telegenisys DOT com>
To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
In-reply-to: <36E40422.157007C1@atos-group.com> (message from Sebastien Carpe
	on Mon, 08 Mar 1999 18:08:50 +0100)
Subject: Re: Time taken for ls -la --color=yes
Reply-to: hcobb AT telegenisys DOT com
References: <199903081638 DOT LAA11084 AT y11a165 DOT neo DOT rr DOT com> <36E40422 DOT 157007C1 AT atos-group DOT com>

Doesn't LS take a lot of time to count the entries in every subdirectory it
encounters (even when it never lists them) just in order to fill out the
stat structures it then throws away?


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com