Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <001901be619f$10cc6e80$1226e70d@channels.usa.xerox.com> From: "Jose I. Cabrera" To: Cc: "cygwin users" Subject: Re: ls and long file names Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 10:45:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All, I agree that this is ls the intended behavior, but I thought that there was a switch that would change this behavior and place them according to file name sizes. Here is an example of VMS: $ dir Directory USER15:[JCABRERA] FILES_20200758.COM;1 FILES_20200758.OUT;1 FTPD.LOG;16 GAZ_OUT.TXT;1 JICMAN.DIR;1 JIC_SUBJ.COM;14 JIC_SUBJ.COM;13 JIC_SUBJ.COM;12 K.MAI;1 LO.JOU;1 LOGIN.COM;11 LOGIN.COM;10 LOGIN.COM;9 LOGINCOM.SAV;1 MAIL$1FEC834100050098.MAI;1 MAIL$20C80C5A00050098.MAI;1 MAIL$5F92D82100050099.MAI;1 MAIL$84EC0F7100050099.MAI;1 MAIL$9058647A0005009B.MAI;1 MAIL$D99B0E9700050099.MAI;1 MAIL$D9D2796100050099.MAI;1 MAIL$DA04301A00050099.MAI;1 MAIL$DA3A1E5600050099.MAI;1 MAIL$DCC4A43B00050099.MAI;1 MAIL$DCC94E7A00050099.MAI;1 MAIL$F5B2F5170005009B.MAI;1 MAIL.MAI;1 MAIL_20203993_SEND.TMP;1 MAIL_206005A6_SEND.TMP;1 MAIN.TPU$JOURNAL;8 MAIN.TPU$JOURNAL;7 MAIN.TPU$JOURNAL;6 NEW_TXT.TPU$JOURNAL;2 NEW_TXT.TPU$JOURNAL;1 P1.;1 RJEOUT1.TMP;1 RJETMP.TMP;1 SDF.MAI;1 SDFSDF.MAI;1 SENDIT.COM;5 SENDIT.COM;4 SENDIT.COM;3 SIG.SIG;2 SIG.SIG;1 SNATPRINT.LIS;3 SNATPRINT.LIS;2 SNATPRINT.LIS;1 WASTEBASKET.MAI;1 X.X;1 _ALIASES.TPU$JOURNAL;1 Total of 50 files. $ as you can see, there are different file name sizes and yet, VMS places them in columns, even though there are short names and long names. I know what you are going to say, "Jose, move to MVS," but, could not we have a switch that would make it this way? It does not have to be the default, just a switch. Thanks. BTW, I love bash. If I didn't, I would not have written at all. jose ----- Original Message ----- From: Earnie Boyd To: Jose I. Cabrera Cc: cygwin users Sent: Thursday, February 25, 1999 9:22 PM Subject: Re: ls and long file names >---"Jose I. Cabrera" wrote: >8< >> Does anyone have any kind of idea on how to fix this? I tried all >kinds of switches and got no different result. >8< > >This is the intended behavior. What is it you want fixed? The only >solution I can see is for you to always display one file per line. To >do this you would do `ls -1'. This is a -one not a lower case el. >== >- \\||// >-------------------o0O0--Earnie--0O0o------------------- >-- earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com -- >-- http://www.freeyellow.com/members5/gw32/index.html -- >----------------------ooo0O--O0ooo---------------------- > >PS: Newbie's, you should visit my page. >_________________________________________________________ >DO YOU YAHOO!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com