Delivered-To: listarch-cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: N8TM AT aol DOT com
Message-ID: <40456cf8.36bfc0e5@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 00:00:21 EST
To: khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU, nox AT jelal DOT kn-bremen DOT de
Cc: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: cross compiler build fail (multiple definition of `fhandler_base::get_nat...
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 226

In a message dated 2/8/99 2:58:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU writes:

<<  Do i need egcs, how is it better than the vanilla gcc that
 > comes with the dev-src.tar.bz2?  I didnt know about the CROSS directory,
 > did everything in the `root' directory (.../src) until now
 > (had to symlink Makefile.in from .. btw)
 
 Yes, egcs. My instructions quite possibly will not work with vanilla/FSF
 GCC. >>
The gcc in dev-src.tar.bz2 is egcs-1.1.  It doesn't behave so much different
from egcs-1.1.1.  I've tried compiling that stuff both ways on W95, and both
produce binaries which appear to work the same as the distributed ones.  I'm
sure that we could go in the principle that 1.1.1 is as good as or better than
1.1, at least when we avoid -march=pentiumpro or install the early-clobbers
for conditional integer moves from recent snapshots of i386.md.

<<Please use what I suggest -- egcs and i586-cygwin32 as the target name,
and then I'll take a look at the errors if any. >>
Was he compiling on linux?  The configures on Windoze tend to slip into the
default target at times, so I found it better not to specify the target there.

--   
Want to unsubscribe from this list?                             
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com