Delivered-To: listarch-cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: N8TM AT aol DOT com Message-ID: <40456cf8.36bfc0e5@aol.com> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 00:00:21 EST To: khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU, nox AT jelal DOT kn-bremen DOT de Cc: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: cross compiler build fail (multiple definition of `fhandler_base::get_nat... Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 226 In a message dated 2/8/99 2:58:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT EDU writes: << Do i need egcs, how is it better than the vanilla gcc that > comes with the dev-src.tar.bz2? I didnt know about the CROSS directory, > did everything in the `root' directory (.../src) until now > (had to symlink Makefile.in from .. btw) Yes, egcs. My instructions quite possibly will not work with vanilla/FSF GCC. >> The gcc in dev-src.tar.bz2 is egcs-1.1. It doesn't behave so much different from egcs-1.1.1. I've tried compiling that stuff both ways on W95, and both produce binaries which appear to work the same as the distributed ones. I'm sure that we could go in the principle that 1.1.1 is as good as or better than 1.1, at least when we avoid -march=pentiumpro or install the early-clobbers for conditional integer moves from recent snapshots of i386.md. <> Was he compiling on linux? The configures on Windoze tend to slip into the default target at times, so I found it better not to specify the target there. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com