From: burley AT gnu DOT org (Craig Burley)
Subject: Re: G77 fork problems
21 Jan 1999 00:19:38 -0800
Message-ID: <199901201931.OAA15186.cygnus.gnu-win32@melange.gnu.org>
References: <006901be44a4$22667d60$29acdfd0 AT InspirePharm DOT Com>
To: Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com
Cc: khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu, d DOT love AT dl DOT ac DOT uk, ssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net,
        gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com, egcs-bugs AT cygnus DOT com

>Yes for your first comment.
>Second, i was thanking him.  He deserves many more thanks for his
>friendly and detailed answers whenever I wrote to him.

That's consistent with what I've seen over here on egcs-bugs!

>And by the way thanks to you to for this kind of e-mail.

Sure, well, it was mostly a sanity-check on my part.  I'm still trying
to get my new email setup working, and have not felt "on top of" things
in g77-land for some time.  Wanted to make sure there wasn't some
g77-defined way of doing fork() that I didn't know about, etc.  :)

        tq vm, (burley)

>From: Craig Burley <burley AT gnu DOT org>
>To: <Ssiddiqi AT InspirePharm DOT Com>
>Cc: <khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>; <d DOT love AT dl DOT ac DOT uk>; <ssiddiqi AT ipass DOT net>;
><gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>; <egcs-bugs AT cygnus DOT com>; <burley AT gnu DOT org>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 1999 1:50 PM
>Subject: Re: G77 fork problems
>
>>>Actually G77 way of handeling FORK makes more sense to
>>>me -- personally.
>>
>>Could you elaborate?  I thought Mumit had explained g77 *doesn't*
>provide
>>a wrapper for fork().  Do you mean you prefer the interface Mumit
>>provided in his (sample) wrapper?  If so, he's the one to thank, not
>>g77!
>>
>>        tq vm, (burley)
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".