From: glenn AT gs DOT fay DOT nc DOT us (Glenn Spell) Subject: Re: Debugging information for DLL's 12 Jan 1999 14:37:22 -0800 Message-ID: <199901120734.XAA26832.cygnus.gnu-win32@shell4.ba.best.com> References: <199901112315 DOT RAA12461 AT hp2 DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu> Reply-To: glenn AT gs DOT fay DOT nc DOT us (Glenn Spell) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Mumit Khan writes> > Glenn Spell writes: > > Doesn't buy you anything? What do you mean? > > I should've prefixed that with "In theory ..." ;-) Ah! > > c) I know for a fact that a 5,xxxKB cygwin1.dll runs a lot > > slower on Windows 95 than a 47xKB one does. Actually, I was fudging. I don't really know that "for a fact". > On most systems, the debug info is not loaded by the loader, and you > basically spend no extra time (other than perhaps some paging penalty > due to a larger executable) when you have debug info; I can imagine > executables running a bit slower on Windows95 which has a lousy VM > (virtual memory), but on NT, it should be barely noticable. > > > Therefore, I figure that I must misunderstand what you're saying. > > It's more that theory and practice don't quite agree here than any > misunderstanding. In my crude way, I was asking for a more clarifying explanation... which you have so graciously provided. Very interesting info. Thank you so much. -glenn -- Glenn Spell Fayetteville, North Carolina, U. S. A. ____________________________________________________ ... blue skies ... happy trails ... sweet dreams ... - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".