From: chicare AT ibm DOT net (Greg Chicares) Subject: Re: Standard C++. 29 Dec 1998 14:29:50 -0800 Message-ID: <368932F0.F6525C66.cygnus.gnu-win32@ibm.net> References: <3688C0DF DOT A2BDAC87 AT uniweb DOT se> Reply-To: chicare AT ibm DOT net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: GNUWin32 Jens Yllman wrote: > I only have the draft from april 1995 to look at. You can get a 1997 draft here: http://www.maths.warwick.ac.uk/cpp/pub/wp/html/cd2/ I believe that is the last free public draft. > But to me it looks like gcc is not able to handle all the new > things in the standard. And the standard C++ library is not fully > implemented. I don't believe any compiler has implemented the full standard yet. There may be some things in the 1995 standard that have been changed since then. Is there a particular feature you're looking for? > Is the standard accepted by ISO and ANSI? It was formally adopted several months ago. That helps explain why the compiler writers still haven't implemented everything yet. > When I talk gcc I mainly talk about the cygnus version. > But I also use gcc on Solaris, HP-UX and Linux from time to time. Egcs is the version that's actively being developed. If you have an earlier gcc version, for instance 2.8, that's different: I hear that no one is working on that anymore. - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".