From: corinna DOT vinschen AT cityweb DOT de (Corinna Vinschen)
Subject: Re: ls -t not working
24 Dec 1998 02:28:41 -0800
Message-ID: <368206C1.1F344D97.cygnus.gnu-win32@cityweb.de>
References: <6034D5FA307AD211A9160008C724FD4A2804FE AT ntdub0e DOT trintech DOT ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Colman Curtin <colman DOT curtin AT trintech DOT com>, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

Colman Curtin wrote:
> 
> I moved sh.exe to sh.old
> and then linked bash.exe to sh.exe and now the configure script gets through
> that test ok.
> 
> this is the output of ls -la
> [...]

Nevertheless, ther's no reason, why this shouldn't work identical in different
shells, because ls is an external command. The shell doesn't have any
influence in ls's output.
The same output with your original sh would be interesting.

> should the '.' entry date change depending on the date and time the last
> file in the dir was changed? I can't check on a un*x system at the moment

yes

Corinna


-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".