From: lhall AT rfk DOT com (Larry Hall) Subject: Re: mounts, ls, and filename completion 12 Aug 1998 01:30:41 -0700 Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980811154356.009b86d0.cygnus.gnu-win32@pop.ma.ultranet.com> References: <19980811113605 DOT 2258 DOT rocketmail AT send103 DOT yahoomail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com, pete AT horus DOT cix DOT co DOT uk, john_r_velman AT mail DOT hac DOT com, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com At 04:36 AM 8/11/98 -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote: >---Pete Jordan wrote: >> >> wrote: >> >> > a) directories that are mounted don't show up using an ls command, >> > b) nor does bash do file name completion on them. >> >> You need to create a directory with the same name as the mount >/before/ >> mounting it. For example: >> >> mkdir /foo >> mount -b D:/ /foo >> > >Only if your on UNIX and this ain't UNIX. As a matter of fact, it is >best _NOT_ to create the directory first as it only confuses you the >user _AND_ cygwin32 the emulation filesystem. > >Now if you were to do: > mkdir //d/foo > mount -b //d/foo /foo >that would be perfectly acceptable and would not confuse you or >cygwin32. > Earnie, I fail to see how what Pete Jordan suggested is any more (and possibly no less) confusing than your suggestion. Whether one or the other approach will confuse the user depends on the user's background. Those that are used to the mount process on UNIX platforms would probably find Pete's suggestion more straight-forward. Personal preferences on mounting syntax aside, I'd be particularly interested on your impressions of how Pete's suggestion would confuse the "cygwin32 the emulation filesystem". Thanks, Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. (781) 239-1053 8 Grove Street (781) 239-1655 - FAX Wellesley, MA 02482-7797 http://www.rfk.com - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".