From: leisner AT sdsp DOT mc DOT xerox DOT com (Marty Leisner) Subject: Re: b19 and cygwin.dll 20 Feb 1998 20:25:00 -0800 Message-ID: <9802210043.AA20657.cygnus.gnu-win32@gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com> References: <010f01bd3d75$71736da0$168cdad0 AT crd DOT inversenet DOT com> To: crd AT inversenet DOT com (Craig Dickson) Cc: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com In message <010f01bd3d75$71736da0$168cdad0 AT crd DOT inversenet DOT com>, you write: >Marty Leisner wrote: > >>I would like the same thing with win95...instead of a bundled application, >>I'd like to see the pieces (binary and source) and understand their >>relationship to run, then install it manually. > >> >>This is desirable, because I may put components on a samba share, and do >>the whole installation from the unix side... > >Of course, the average PC user (probably 90% or more of the PC userbase) >would be totally incapable of installing software if it were done as you >suggest, so it's silly to propose such a thing. Since Windows 95 (by volume >the most significant Win32 platform) is targeted for the average user, and >not the professional software engineer or systems administrator, it's I think you missed the point. I'm not say not to have a bundled application someplace (which is an enormous exe). I'm saying give people a choice. Also gnu-win is not targeted at you average PC user. marty - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".