From: ert AT cit DOT org DOT by (Andrew Lipnitsky) Subject: Re: mount: HKEY_CURRENT_USER vs HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE 9 Feb 1998 06:01:21 -0800 Message-ID: <34DF0007.FDEF74EF.cygnus.gnu-win32@cit.org.by> References: <317FF5D11BF2D011B81E00A024960DC41D74FC AT axis DOT optimedia DOT co DOT il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Cygnus Solution GnuWin32 Mail List Cc: Vassilii Khachaturov Hello Vasilii. Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: > < -- sniped --- > > All this diverges with the standard registry usage policies, where > machine-installation-specific preferences are stored under > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE (I think it's obvious that the root FS mount is > machine-specific!), > whereas user preferences, which are to be shared across several > machines, are stored in the HKEY_CURRENT_USER hive. (E.g., LOGNAME). > It > also makes it much harder to make one user's profile be quickly copied > & > modified for other user's usage, > as the other's userr workstation might simply not have the physical > disk > where the root mount of the 1st goes. > > < -- sniped -- > > 2) Wouldn't it be nice for admin. purposes to have the mount info > stored > in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE? > 3) How about a compromise solution --- have a similar key under > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, and check both, having user-specific preferences > be > read after the default ones (cf. the system and user PATH in win32)? I fairly agree with you. I think that main mount table must be in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE and user specific mount table in HKEY_CURRENT_USER. Andrew Lipnitsky. - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".