From: fjh AT cs DOT mu DOT OZ DOT AU (Fergus Henderson) Subject: Re: bash-shell output 4 Feb 1998 23:57:56 -0800 Message-ID: <19980205142019.42961.cygnus.gnu-win32@mundook.cs.mu.OZ.AU> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Andrew Innes Cc: ngo AT wossolit DOT teles DOT de, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com On 04-Feb-1998, Andrew Innes wrote: > On 04 Feb 1998 17:07:50 -0800, Nils Goesche said: > >You have to uncomment that fflush-line. But the usual shells > >like command.com or 4nt don't need that line. This is somewhat > >annoying. Can I at least force the shell somehow to flush > >input/output buffers? Some other programs are just unusable > >because of this behavior. > > This is a consequence of the design of Windows (well, that combined with > the behaviour of the Microsoft C runtime library). > > Most DOS/Windows compilers make stdout unbuffered if isatty() returns > true, and isatty() in turn calls GetFileType on the OS file handle - if > the handle is a console handle, then isatty returns true. > > Emacs has to redirect stdin and stdout/stderr for subprocesses through > pipes so it can communicate with them, but cannot hide the fact that > the handles are pipe handles. Does that mean that - a proper pseudo-tty implementation (one for which isatty() would return true) is not possible on Windows? - a proper pseudo-tty implementation is possible, but cygwin32 doesn't have one yet? - a proper pseudo-tty implementation is possible, and cygwin32 has one, but emacs doesn't use it? -- Fergus Henderson | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger fjh AT 128 DOT 250 DOT 37 DOT 3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp. - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".