From: Bernd DOT Schilpp AT brokat DOT de (Bernd Schilpp)
Subject: Re: What about RSXNT instead of cygwin32???
17 Oct 1997 01:47:05 -0700
Message-ID: <34462208.B3FC3369.cygnus.gnu-win32@brokat.de>
References: <199710152130 DOT OAA20769 AT cirdan DOT cygnus DOT com>
Reply-To: Bernd DOT Schilpp AT brokat DOT de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Peter Dalgaard BSA <p DOT dalgaard AT kubism DOT ku DOT dk>
Cc: Geoffrey Noer <noer AT cygnus DOT com>, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com



Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:

> Geoffrey Noer <noer AT cygnus DOT com> writes:
>
> >
> > > Yes, I've tried that and it certainly seems to be a class act,
> > > although not as ambitious as cygwin32.
> >
> > From what I have heard, RSXNT sounds like it does significantly
> > less but isn't beta quality.  I've also heard that nobody is actively
> > maintaining RSXNT -- anyone know differently?
>
> As far as I can tell, the author is still around, but hasn't posted
> anything on the net since the summer holidays. The current version is
> from March 97, so it's not exactly rapidly changing, but it's probably
> a bit early to declare it dead.

I know from Rainer Schnitker that there will be a new version (1.4) of
RSXNT with some improvements. But 1.4 will not come this October.



-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".