From: noer AT cygnus DOT com (Geoffrey Noer)
Subject: Re: What about RSXNT instead of cygwin32???
16 Oct 1997 01:02:59 -0700
Message-ID: <199710152130.OAA20769.cygnus.gnu-win32@cirdan.cygnus.com>
References: <x24t6ku66z DOT fsf AT blueberry DOT kubism DOT ku DOT dk>
Content-Type: text
To: p DOT dalgaard AT kubism DOT ku DOT dk (Peter Dalgaard BSA)
Cc: Bernd DOT Schilpp AT brokat DOT de, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

> Yes, I've tried that and it certainly seems to be a class act,
> although not as ambitious as cygwin32.

From what I have heard, RSXNT sounds like it does significantly
less but isn't beta quality.  I've also heard that nobody is actively
maintaining RSXNT -- anyone know differently?

I hope Cygwin32 will be a class act some day.  :-)

> On the other hand, RSXNT includes a resource compiler

BTW, future GNU-Win32 releases will include one.

-- 
Geoffrey Noer
noer AT cygnus DOT com
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".