From: sos AT prospect DOT com DOT ru (Sergey Okhapkin)
Subject: RE: bash performance not so gooood
17 Sep 1997 22:32:10 -0700
Message-ID: <01BCC413.5EC283C0.cygnus.gnu-win32@sos>
To: "DKhosla AT Compaq DOT com" <DKhosla AT Compaq DOT com>,
        "'dahms AT ifk20 DOT mach DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de'"
	 <dahms AT ifk20 DOT mach DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de>
Cc: "gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com" <gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com>

dahms AT ifk20 DOT mach DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de wrote:
> 
> I'd like to know the results for OpenNT 2.0, too.
> However, OpenNT replaces the MS posix.dll, and so does, I think, UWIN...

UWIN is not a posix subsystem like OpenNT. UWIN runs on top of Win32 API like cygwin.

> But without doubt, Linux on the same box would win hands down 8-)

Shell scripts runs much faster on linux, but cpu eating tasks (like compilation) requires almost the same time.

-- 
Sergey Okhapkin, http://www.lexa.ru/sos
Moscow, Russia
Looking for a job

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".