From: pete AT lilith DOT demon DOT co DOT uk (Pete John)
Subject: Flex/Byacc
31 Aug 1997 23:13:00 -0700
Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <872930487.0510474.0.cygnus.gnu-win32@lilith.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01BCB528.CA4881C0"
Original-To: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at punt-2.mail.demon.net
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1008.3
X-MimeOle: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE Engine V4.71.1008.3
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BCB528.CA4881C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi.=20
I'm using the Flex/Byacc utilities distributed with the Cygwin32 b18 =
package (and they are excellent utillities too), but I'm concerned about =
the commercial implications for redistributing my software because of =
the GPL.
I have read that software developed with Flex is freely redistributable, =
but I'm not sure about either Flex or Byacc..
Please can you help?
Many thanks
Pete John.
------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BCB528.CA4881C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi.
I'm using the =
Flex/Byacc=20
utilities distributed with the Cygwin32 b18 package (and they are =
excellent=20
utillities too), but I'm concerned about the commercial implications for =
redistributing my software because of the GPL.
I have read that software =
developed=20
with Flex is freely redistributable, but I'm not sure about either Flex =
or=20
Byacc..
Please can you=20
help?
Many thanks
Pete =
John.
------=_NextPart_000_0000_01BCB528.CA4881C0--
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".