From: ahc AT lanl DOT gov ("Allen H. Cogbill")
Subject: How does Cygnus compare to RSX
1 Aug 1997 17:12:32 -0700
Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <33E25377.5B32.cygnus.gnu-win32@lanl.gov>
Reply-To: ahc AT lanl DOT gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02E (OS/2; I)
Original-To: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Original-CC: ahc AT lanl DOT gov
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

I've never used the Cygnus-Win32 development environment, but I
have used RSXNT, which is an extension of the EMX project (for
OS/2) to Win32. How does Cygnus compare? Does it provide the 
same capabilities? RSX seems especially easy to use (to me, at
least), and appears to have few bugs. What isn't available is
a g77 port, whereas I note that is is available under Cygnus.

Any information greatly appreciated.

Allen Cogbill
Los Alamos National Lab
ahc AT lanl DOT gov
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".