From: bhogan AT bedlam DOT rahul DOT net (Bill Hogan)
Subject: Re: building lynx2-7-* on gnuwin32
23 Jun 1997 12:21:14 -0700
Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970622204651.1654A-100000.cygnus.gnu-win32@bedlam.rahul.net>
Reply-To: bhogan AT rahul DOT net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Original-To: Arlindo da Silva <dasilva AT woodmore DOT gsfc DOT nasa DOT gov>
Original-cc: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
In-Reply-To: <199706230254.WAA02226@woodmore.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

On Sun, 22 Jun 1997, Arlindo da Silva wrote:

> [In reply to my]
> > 
> >   Has anyone here had any luck getting either the Lynx2-7-1 
> > `make linux-ncurses' or `make linux-slang' to work on gnu-win32?
> > 
> >   Does this idea make sense?
> >  
> [that]
  
> I know that DJ Delorie hacked a Lynx port for DJGPP, you may want to
> search their mailing archives at
> 
>           http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/
> 

  If so, but that is not what I am asking about.

  Also there is a Lynx binary compiled under Borland "C" that runs as a
Win95 console app, but it uses Borland bcc (which I neither own nor wish
to) and it does not seem to me to be very well-integrated with what
appears to me to be the main wing of the current GNU/autoconf-oriented
Lynx-2.7.1 development effort.

  I think it would be preferable to have `make gnuwin32-ncurses' and/or
`make gnuwin32-slang' options within the main line of Lynx development if
that makes sense technically.
  
   Bill
  --
<billh AT autobahn DOT org>

                Maximize end-user autonomy.


 
  

     




-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".