From: jqb AT netcom DOT com (Jim Balter)
Subject: Re: Sorting environment
12 Apr 1997 17:30:37 -0700
Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <334F1CC6.1AD4.cygnus.gnu-win32@netcom.com>
References: <199704112005 DOT QAA14340 AT just DOT smarts DOT com> <334EFBA3 DOT 3BB8 AT netcom DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
Original-To: Ken Estes <estes AT smarts DOT com>, smueller AT microsoft DOT com, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

Jim Balter wrote:
> 
> Ken Estes wrote:
> 
> > All documentaion I have seen requires that NT environment be sorted
> > (more then just one parenthetical comment), thus it is a constraint of
> 
> Cites, please.  The MSVC helpbook info for CreateProcess, for instance,
> does not state that the environment block must be sorted.

Sorry; I take it back.  The MSVC doc has the same comment, buried
in the same remark about =X current directory info.  Not where it
belongs, of course.

Note that cygwin mishandles those too.  It turns =X=foo
into !X=foo, so they don't confuse getenv, but doesn't turn them back
when passing them to CreateProcess.

--
<J Q B>
-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".