From: db AT med-in DOT uni-sb DOT de Subject: Differences Win95 / WinNT 19 Mar 1997 00:39:12 -0800 Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Distribution: cygnus Message-ID: <199703190611.HAA12511.cygnus.gnu-win32@ukh3029.med-in.uni-sb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Envelope: Original-To: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Phone: (0 / +49) 6841 - 16 3046 Fax: (0 / +49) 6841 - 16 3369 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Sirs, we use groff (compiled with b17) on Windows NT and 95 PCs. Under NT the program could be called groff with some parameters. Groff starts some other programs (tbl, troff, grops) without problems. Under Win 95 all programs have to be called separately with input from and output to file. NT: groff - ..... < filea > fileb 95: tbl < filea > fileb troff ... < fileb > filea grops < filea > fileb (under Unix, groff could also be called directly) What is the reason for this behaviour of Win 95? I need also say that this sequence is called out of a tcl/Tk-program. Is there a chance to improve speed with direct call of groff under Win95? Thanks Dieter -- Dr. med. dipl.-math Dieter Becker Tel.: (0 / +49) 6841 - 16 3046 Medizinische Universitaets- und Poliklinik Fax.: (0 / +49) 6841 - 16 3332 Innere Medizin III D - 66421 Homburg / Saar Email: db AT med-in DOT uni-sb DOT de - For help on using this list, send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".