From: leisner AT sdsp DOT mc DOT xerox DOT com ("Marty Leisner")
Subject: Re: Cygnus Cygwin32 Press Release 1/21/97
14 Feb 1997 00:39:05 -0800
Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <9702132049.AA14186.cygnus.gnu-win32@gnu.sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96
Original-To: Stan Shebs <shebs AT cygnus DOT com>
Original-Cc: jqb AT netcom DOT com, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 Feb 1997 17:25:47 PST."
             <199702130125 DOT RAA14392 AT andros DOT cygnus DOT com> 
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com


> 
>    Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 04:45:24 -0800
>    From: Jim Balter <jqb AT netcom DOT com>
> 
>    I was not referring to Cygnus' philosophy in general, only their
>    philosophy towards FREE software.  Placing free software under
>    both the GPL and under a restricted-distribution license is a definite
>    deviation.
> 
>

Actually, this approach makes a lot of sense.  Patrick Powell is doing
it with LPRng...

Most companies shy away from GPL.  Saying "I'll pay for the privalege
not to have post source" is fine (in my book).  

It seems to solve a lot of problems...

-- 
marty
leisner AT sdsp DOT mc DOT xerox DOT com  
Member of the League for Programming Freedom

-- 
marty
leisner AT sdsp DOT mc DOT xerox DOT com  
Member of the League for Programming Freedom


-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".