From: fjh AT cs DOT mu DOT OZ DOT AU (Fergus Henderson) Subject: Re: Cygnus Cygwin32 Press Release 1/21/97 11 Feb 1997 11:47:49 -0800 Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Distribution: cygnus Message-ID: <199702110903.UAA11659.cygnus.gnu-win32@murlibobo.cs.mu.OZ.AU> Content-Type: text Original-To: Paul AT chocolat DOT foobar DOT co DOT uk (Paul Shirley) Original-Cc: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com (gnu-win32) In-Reply-To: <2AUWrCAMx2$yEwOt@foobar.co.uk> from "Paul Shirley" at Feb 10, 97 06:43:24 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Paul Shirley, you wrote: > > Jim Balter writes > >> Unfortunently what they are > >> saying is only they can make money from this effort. > > No. What they are saying is you can make money under the LGPL licence > terms *or* pay them some money for normal commercial terms (ie no > source/object distribution required) That's correct, except that the cygwin library is available under GPL terms, not LGPL terms. That is quite a significant difference. If it were LGPL'd, then you could use cygwin without having to release source to your application, but you can't do that under the GPL. So the current situation is that if you want to use the cygwin library, and you don't want to release source, then you have to pay Cygnus for a commercial license. -- Fergus Henderson | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger fjh AT 128 DOT 250 DOT 37 DOT 3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp. - For help on using this list, send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".