From: MLDickey AT softart DOT com Subject: Re[2]: du does not find all directories 8 Feb 1997 00:05:01 -0800 Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Distribution: cygnus Message-ID: <0000C37D.1408.cygnus.gnu-win32@softart.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Original-To: "'Ken Evans'" , Sergey Okhapkin Original-Cc: "'gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com'" Content-Description: cc:Mail note part Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com The cluster size under Win95 is dependent on the size of the partition in question. I think I have some rough numbers ... nope can't find them. I don't remember where I've seen them, but it's true. The larger the partition size, the larger the cluster size. The table is ROUGHLY like this: 0-200M 4k 201-500M 8k 500-1000M 16k 1000-2000M 32k Again, these are rough -- from memory not from valid source. mld ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: RE: du does not find all directories Author: Sergey Okhapkin at Internet Date: 2/7/97 5:06 PM Ken Evans wrote: >C:\WINDOWS>dir system.bad > > Volume in drive C is SEAGATE > Volume Serial Number is 155D-07CF > Directory of C:\WINDOWS > > SYSTEM BAD 994,684 11-17-96 3:06p SYSTEM.BAD > 1 file(s) 994,684 bytes > 0 dir(s) 264,503,296 bytes free > > C:\WINDOWS>du system.bad > 486 system.bad > > C:\WINDOWS>ls system.bad > system.bad > > C:\WINDOWS>ls -l system.bad > -rw-r--r-- 1 500 everyone 994684 Nov 17 15:06 system.bad > > C:\WINDOWS>du -sk system.bad > 486 system.bad > > C:\WINDOWS> > > And it still doesn't get all the bytes and directories, but it > looks like 2K is the magic number, -k or not. It seems to me, 2K is your cluster size. Am I right? -- Sergey Okhapkin Moscow, Russia Looking for a job. - For help on using this list, send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help". - For help on using this list, send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".