From: knight AT iname DOT com (Warren & SLS Knight) Subject: RE: Why is cygwin.dll? 17 Jan 1997 00:35:10 -0800 Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Distribution: cygnus Message-ID: <01BC03FE.3AACA220.cygnus.gnu-win32@knight.dircon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Original-To: GNU-WIN32 Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Grant if you are interested in compiling original programs using gcc, but don't want the overhead of cygwin.dll look at the minimalist GNU-Win32 information at http://www.fu.is.saga-u.ac.jp/~colin/mingw32.html. It will allow you to compile native Win32 software, last time I looked instructions for setting it up under b17 is not given at this time. But it is definitely doable after a little trial and error. Now if you want to compile Unix apps stick with the straight gnu-win32 setup. Warren ---------- From: Grant Leslie[SMTP:grantl AT deerinet DOT nb DOT ca] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 1997 1:40 AM To: GNU-WIN32 Subject: Re: Why is cygwin.dll? <> assume. I'm sure it would be nice to make simple programs that don't require cygwin.dll I even think I read somewhere about Cygnus working out how to do this. Though you would probably still end up with an exe much larger than one that uses cygwin.dll. - For help on using this list, send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help". - For help on using this list, send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".