From: kuku AT gilberto DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de (Christoph Kukulies) Subject: Re: building gcc native compiler on linux 12 Nov 1996 01:33:35 -0800 Sender: daemon AT cygnus DOT com Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Distribution: cygnus Message-ID: <199611120835.JAA25337.cygnus.gnu-win32@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Reply-To: Christoph Kukulies Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <9611111404.AA16834@gutrune.vlsi.polymtl.ca> from Michel Dagenais at "Nov 11, 96 09:04:24 am" Original-To: dagenais AT vlsi DOT polymtl DOT ca (Michel Dagenais) Original-Cc: lindalu AT qua DOT crl DOT melco DOT co DOT jp, gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL25 (25)] Content-Length: 881 Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com > This is what I type on my slackware linux: > ./configure --build=i386-unknown-linux --host=i386-unknown-cygwin32 > --target=i386-unknown-cygwin32 > > then I do make, and it seems there's pathing problem... > In file included from cccp.c:40: > config.h:1 i386/xm-cygwin32.h: No such file or directory > make:*** [cccp.o] Error 1 > > I had a similar problem. Dont specify --target, --host is sufficient > and --target does bad things in this context for some reason. > - > For help on using this list, send a message to > "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help". > While being at it (cross compilation), which distribution should one use? Should one grab gcc-2.7.2.x (or whatever is current on the gnu ftp servers/mirrors) or should one grab gnu-win32/b16 from cygnus? --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku AT gil DOT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de - For help on using this list, send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".