From: dimm AT vnet DOT ibm DOT com
Subject: Re: Use GDB for not GCC's exes
23 Oct 1996 11:35:00 -0700
Sender: daemon AT cygnus DOT com
Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Distribution: cygnus
Message-ID: <326E04C5.794B.cygnus.gnu-win32@vnet.ibm.com>
References: <326369A2 DOT 960 DOT cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT missinglink DOT co DOT il>
			<q4hgnnhodw DOT fsf AT cleaver DOT cygnus DOT com>
			<326C54FB DOT 46D6 DOT cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT missinglink DOT co DOT il> <q4buduhjpr DOT fsf AT cleaver DOT cygnus DOT com> <326DCB1D DOT 6241 AT missinglink DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; AIX 2)
Original-To: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com
Original-Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder AT cleaver DOT cygnus DOT com>
Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com

> Michael Snyder wrote:
> >
> > be a highly desireable secondary goal.  Whether that will happen is at
> > least in part dependant on who would want it and how badly.  Does
> > anybody else think that using gdb to debug code compiled with
> > MicroSoft compilers is an important feature?

Oh, yeah, but alternatively you could make gcc generate debugging
information in format understandable by MS debugger, say the one that
is in MS Dev. Studio. While gdb doesn't work on PPC/NT, cygwin32 is
pretty much useless on PPC/NT too, as a developer's environment...

Dmitri Makarov.
dimm AT vnet DOT ibm DOT com
-
For help on using this list, send a message to
"gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".