From: randolph AT pcx DOT ncd DOT com ("Randolph Fritz") Subject: Threads vs. stdio 17 Oct 1996 15:37:23 -0700 Sender: daemon AT cygnus DOT com Approved: cygnus DOT gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Distribution: cygnus Message-ID: <9610171204.ZM22261.cygnus.gnu-win32@hood.pcx.ncd.com> References: <199610170938 DOT SAA27561 AT bird DOT fu DOT is DOT saga-u DOT ac DOT jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Colin Peters "Minimalist GNU-Win32" (Oct 17, 6: 38pm) X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.0.1 04apr94) Original-To: gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Original-Sender: owner-gnu-win32 AT cygnus DOT com Ok, folks! I'm writing a test program that involves a lot of simultaneous file copies. My strategy for this is to create one thread per copy operation. Will this be reliable with cygwin? Will I be able to use the standard i/o libraries from the sub-threads, as long as I don't do anything silly? -- Randolph Fritz QA consultant NCD/PCX division randolph AT pcx DOT ncd DOT com - For help on using this list, send a message to "gnu-win32-request AT cygnus DOT com" with one line of text: "help".