DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 57V9xni92328517
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5ED57385843B
Subject: Re: PE format conformance issues in rebase.exe results
 incompatibility with LLVM-lld
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <1749211000852.785937412.3467708457@ezweb.ne.jp>
 <4c738bdf-be6e-38b6-897f-85b2e214636b@jdrake.com>
 <87ldmz7v9t.fsf@Gerda.invalid> <87h5xn7src.fsf@Gerda.invalid>
Message-ID: <c88ee29a-7ebc-8931-23d2-f8951f93bcec@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 11:58:34 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87h5xn7src.fsf@Gerda.invalid>
Precedence: list
From: Christian Franke via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Cc: Christian Franke <Christian.Franke@t-online.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>

ASSI via Cygwin wrote:
> ASSI via Cygwin writes:
>> Which program produced this message?  Loooking at the sources I think
>> that should have been rebase and not peflags?  Can you provide test
>> instructions for building such an executable?
> I could reproduce it.  It seems that the lld linked executable always
> has an image checksum of 0x00000000, which obviously is not correct.
> The peflags program itself does chase the correct pointer chain to the
> headers.

Possibly forgotten related patch:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2023-October/043230.html

-- 
Regards,
Christian


-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple