DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51QDb5vj163599
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51QDb5vj163599
Authentication-Results: delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=ZC5yz9Qc
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 65BB53858D26
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1740577023;
	bh=eSWrVxtDbIYD8dY5kBAnhcnbU2kbVi7WtoKk5JtUmEI=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	 From;
	b=ZC5yz9QcIRIcgIT1eG+4etdtozJisZhQqJmYgQciOwM8EyyPKWDkz1tNSsyXBHHHG
	 7wBelD1fARr7tg+svIOnayKBk2qVr1QWKg6kYqK3FJKRaYWF0XE7E0kVPNdL80Xkge
	 B2uld+Bl+3+D7BwPxuog8SHT6mzF0R/P1PL6PzD4=
X-Original-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 93D4C3858D26
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:36:39 +0100
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Registering new |WNNC_NET_*| keys ? / Re: Document support for @
 character in UNC paths
Message-ID: <Z78Y5xXF_nIqsY9B@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <CANH4o6NW7NnygLoRgWmMMV7qY4UwK6vKnVKCRX2u=9MCWhdMdg@mail.gmail.com>
 <Z7hVWK1_pzYrIzBG@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <CALWcw=E4kcJ+UbsRkqkFpgRx734H33NhJhspuVH2KgDzV4jL3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <Z7my7gejHoLjf2F1@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <CALWcw=EqzTv-J5pm1DVT8Un+J2QWLtV70nF1nU9DO_P3Cg4OOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALWcw=GDQ0kPGXBXMa3-9LdFX3fjsVdUK-VS1TpwdO_XtFvXMA@mail.gmail.com>
 <Z73yniyu8UVlSafF@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <CALWcw=HuN79qXaupYvXuFSWXNj0LmAxV4-EWsCgyYJ63xkVn1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <ba7af2e1-87e7-71fe-7a19-be5cd8587369@jdrake.com>
 <CAKAoaQnxk+OtYxHr_9g=0D6Pb9N1sDXjqNirt5LWze-apyybEw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKAoaQnxk+OtYxHr_9g=0D6Pb9N1sDXjqNirt5LWze-apyybEw@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Cc: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 51QDb5vj163599

On Feb 26 11:15, Roland Mainz via Cygwin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:22 AM Jeremy Drake via Cygwin
> <cygwin@cygwin.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Feb 2025, Takeshi Nishimura via Cygwin wrote:
> > > No, it's beegfs.sys you install.
> > > SMB is not used, it uses its own protocol. If you do a
> > > FileRemoteProtocolInfo query the protocol field says it's a
> > > WNNC_NET_RDR2SAMPLE.
> >
> > Always nice when a driver doesn't change "sample" idenfiers.  It seems
> > Virtualbox shared folders also squats on this identifier.  I imagine
> > things don't go well if one attempts to install beegfs.sys on a virtualbox
> > virtual machine with their guest drivers installed...
> 
> I think the problem is that no one in the OpenSource world really
> knows how to register new |WNNC_NET_*| keys. QEmu shared folders,
> DOKANY, ms-nfs41-client, etc. all use |WNNC_NET_RDR2SAMPLE| because
> the sample filesystem code uses that.

So if ms-nfs41-client uses WNNC_NET_RDR2SAMPLE, we don't have to handle
these shares when checking the WNNC_NET_MS_NFS provider.  While it would
be nice if the nfs v4 driver would use some other WNNC type, this is
at least helpful for handling WNNC_NET_MS_NFS shares, because they
have more than one quirk...


Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

