DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51K9jJSw200402
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51K9jJSw200402
Authentication-Results: delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=AGedHS+D
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BE9CC3858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1740044718;
	bh=C7CfUhNSFs7HdMo8TlVSmV6LqeBPSG2MEGJF7VEsbio=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	 From;
	b=AGedHS+DPcZpZ33wCz1k5yHPswepbkIjqaSztmgRoNtXw4JOWktRxPRA6wyC6ZD2A
	 6emn4LyZh0Zn9p3DecT5RYbXpAwj5Hejrgsvr1NcHWHh75+wYraHpwbf7ar14hpv+x
	 MbqN2GVaMp5b+J1UDdnxmHwP5r/8m/ilORA8Koko=
X-Original-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DA6D13858D20
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:44:48 +0100
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cygwin 3.6.0 vs. libbsd 0.11.7-3: -lbsd breaks setproctitle()
Message-ID: <Z7b5kJPe0JHuJD9H@calimero.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <4250e737-217a-2b55-c6df-8567b283da15@t-online.de>
 <Z7XMsdPjKyaOrNIQ@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <e364ba68-bafd-c79e-abbf-d1382e6d3463@t-online.de>
 <Z7XfUHzBmGikTBqf@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <Z7X6vnVOxIz13Hue@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <Z7ZJSzkfA6AMBjtD@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <2b2f037c-eb06-1edb-bd45-e72e9498af05@t-online.de>
 <Z7b4Wl_8HYaboYaL@calimero.vinschen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Z7b4Wl_8HYaboYaL@calimero.vinschen.de>
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Cc: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 51K9jJSw200402

On Feb 20 10:39, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> On Feb 20 08:34, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > > I uploaded a 0.11.8-1 test package which fixes this issue.  I'll
> > > propagate it to non-test when 3.6.0 is released.
> > 
> > A quick test with stress-ng was successful with both libbsd 0.11.8-1 and
> > 0.12.2-1 test releases:
    ^^^^^^^^

My reading skills... sigh.



> > - Old executable using setproctitle{,_init}() from cygbsd-0.dll still runs.
> > - A rebuild uses setproctitle() from cygwin1.dll.
> > - The testcases using other functions linked to cygbsd-0.dll succeed and
> > setproctitle() now works:
> > 
> > $ procps -C stress-ng -o pid,args --sort pid
> >   PID COMMAND
> > 24706 ./stress-ng --heapsort 1 --mergesort 1 --radixsort 1 --monte-carlo 1
> > --str 1 --wcs 1 -t 30 --verify -v -M
> > 24707 stress-ng-heapsort [run]
> > 24708 stress-ng-mergesort [run]
> > 24709 stress-ng-radixsort [run]
> > 24710 stress-ng-monte-carlo [run]  <= uses arc4random()
> > 24711 stress-ng-str [run] <= uses strlcat/cpy()
> > 24712 stress-ng-wcs [run] <= uses wcslcat/cpy()
> 
> Great, thanks for testing!
> 
> Yesterday I managed to get the latest 0.12.2 version of libbsd running,
> which needs tweaking of the configury.  I uploaded a 0.12.2-1 test
> package late at night.
> 
> However, this morning it occured to me that there are a lot more
> symbols in libbsd, which could be removed as exported symbols, while
> staying available in the DLL itself for backward compat.
> It doesn't make much sense to use the libbsd function for newly built
> applications if the functions are available in the Cygwin DLL anyway,
> right?
> 
> I'll twiddle a bit with this and will come up with a 0.12.2-2 later
> today.
> 
> Can you test the 0.12.2-1 in the meantime?  That would be nice.

So you already did, thank you :}


Corinna

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

