DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 50ECsslE3311848
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 50ECsslE3311848
Authentication-Results: delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=y7Y2jlV5
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4A490385AC26
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1736859292;
	bh=VmYMLsR0Q1IeoU1DyQpzEY/dnKpFKIldqVBvcAhHqUE=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=y7Y2jlV5++sZb5i3b6FRTNd2u9ApIP6PFT0ObxdGXBh+cxSsIGlD5ay7+484LBc6e
	 clen18lbrcFu78hyebk25X6vV8B7Cs4BIRIqEVeo8IWYrBy+C/yAtF1D7WqNGdr2lG
	 bCup760D7NGX5S/8+rN3E1g8gqwTEOa742CaNRaw=
X-Original-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D91B2385AC26
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org D91B2385AC26
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1736859219; cv=none;
 b=XvX3NQuQ7pBR9w4bdqKWIKF3hMOxEQZ0SqqNgC2q+evslQmOKDPgpC9/NxwsgFACukc+uWyOf1W1ktWoWJbqhadcVUNMK8w8gS4BccMSXrSmb0dUmMOY2Mas+BTMcxHYzHITWSE0BcVHDgNkfPuFx6pj2gG0NdSELdDZZIibD60=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
 t=1736859219; c=relaxed/simple;
 bh=fIvZzTrC4GBQhFyQOUNNAiStu4GhdqxAIxQcTW8Ybcg=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature;
 b=vKjBaVx+uURVRhLg2b0vwERUph89aJVrMIukcYPQKSlG/I/uv7Z3zyA+7UoOWmbb7spo25QxKt2u7e5OSNeRQ+TCqI7XefuJ1XB6lMx7KcazB0udiAJLb4ihCruc59aY5rwEHdjGM5XnlQ4Fp5eEZGXKkA0xmKL5+AbFzHHuYok=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D91B2385AC26
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 21:53:34 +0900
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Hangs in cygwin 3.5.5-1: should 3.5.5-1 be rolled back?
Message-Id: <20250114215334.44a02b313f451d870a2beca1@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20250114091723.37adbe4e332d2af1336a943d@nifty.ne.jp>
References: <e64d01c0-ecad-4427-a0b4-1b30b4b45ed9@yahoo.de>
 <7d3aa20f-45b8-44a8-a353-a374d082c0b5@yahoo.de>
 <20250114085736.907bf487dfb51d0c5e11c402@nifty.ne.jp>
 <671e9695-5b53-c237-5265-5f95d3d7700e@jdrake.com>
 <20250114091723.37adbe4e332d2af1336a943d@nifty.ne.jp>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>

Hi Michael,

On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 09:17:23 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 16:10:17 -0800 (PST)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Jan 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > Personally, I personally prefer releasing 3.5.6 ASAP. However, we
> > > are not sure that we have already fixed all the major problems in
> > > 3.5.5.
> > >
> > > Can you please test latest cygwin 3.6.0 (TEST) whether the your
> > > CI issue still happens?
> > >
> > > If the CI problem still happen even with 3.6.0 (TEST), we should
> > > consider rolling back to 3.5.4. Otherwise, releasing 3.5.6 is
> > > the proper way to go, I think.
> > 
> > Unless I'm mistaken,
> > https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2024q4/013145.html has not yet
> > been pushed to any branch (main or cygwin-3_5-branch), so I'd expect the
> > issues to still happen.
> 
> Oops!
> Corinna, how about pushing this patch only to the main branch for now?

cygwin 3.6.0-0.307.ga22a0ad7c4f0 (Test), which includes the patch:
https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2024q4/013145.html,
is now available.

Could you please test?

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
