DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C348B3858D3C
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ZimDqKx1R13FdV2q@mercury.signalpunk.com>
 <ZimJchxllNm8P96S@mercury.signalpunk.com>
 <970d3bc2-497e-4f10-a3e0-8b9701d8601b@dronecode.org.uk>
 <0579a146-626c-4aac-9436-49e9037a5266@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0579a146-626c-4aac-9436-49e9037a5266@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:15:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD8GWst2Mc60tYqHcVR4uqFYt2+CEhvF-r0f3qvWXe1wsLyOHA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: native symlinks and non-existent targets
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Csaba_R=C3=A1duly?= <rcsaba@gmail.com>
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
From: Lee via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: Lee <ler762@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 4:11 PM Csaba Ráduly wrote:
>
> On 25/04/2024 15:15, Jon Turney via Cygwin wrote:
> > On 24/04/2024 23:36, Christopher Layne via Cygwin wrote:
> > [...]
> >> If it isn't true then this seems trivial to fix.
> >
> > This assertion is trivially disproven by the lack of a patch attached. :)
> >
> >
> I don't think this is worth a gold star, but a jester's cap is surely
> warranted :)

I disagree.
  "This assertion is trivially disproven by the lack of a patch attached."
is totally worth a gold star

Regards,
Lee

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple