X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 07DF13858C2F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1705927332; bh=OUdwGfp8PB6gffIZRopysQwThrsR1nzxWkocnCTaQR8=; h=To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=CjAwzfGPXfmL1KcvwzV4vG3LaLQA1Q9BljiS9aBKW1BJLxmXsAtW5QbgDD5zTbO1+ JSbTQAud09XUdGY0ZOWcuHQjT+b0eW/ym/hljSc2C9Kgb20p1Kvl/WT2F9W0dsN44c scN1t4+Y1hg8uPjrrJ/SstO1D/S+Hzv8FcZMNNUo= X-Original-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Delivered-To: cygwin@cygwin.com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 918183858D3C ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 918183858D3C ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705927310; cv=none; b=TUmcVn0JCLSJpnXl0Jw0lkfv5ey6R/VL8JrObqWNW9oRfvZne+FUtbMPhx3aUthEt6omu/sZyL30ZW1iCNIgwu+z02HBLAOJV+ka7mlkOsUlq8VQ2Dq3B4mqrXoghKtk8Yr20jdu++3CJBB2PUon1or8vIPWzttVwabI2N2NRoY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705927310; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yQmoW0WwWZERT9H8t9jOE+3HgBoZm12xEEpq71lWDxI=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=lYUzQW3neJnGQvMcBhwgj9dnnHStQFlYLS2oy4h3pXbDn1om3w3WbJwmMNWwnLsSP6zt0nMoAsy6rCcMn0+StyUzcM/bK8H+41e3n8o/ocPVeF97d40ayd5wlPIvdt01uqykPeQPCVKFr8AlyS4GpHOsrQdVwB3ET+3MSIzEfPw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Possiblly bug of cygwin1.dll In-Reply-To: (Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin's message of "Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:49:55 +0100") References: <20240120131825.4157c259fe058155137d6fe0@nifty.ne.jp> <20240120141349.cde31e62177a0405b0ee9934@nifty.ne.jp> <87v87ov03x.fsf@Gerda.invalid> <20240120212427.1e69fd3655ece73ecd508def@nifty.ne.jp> <20240121201051.795a4405576a97ab8729e273@nifty.ne.jp> <20240122123023.b8eaac0e50d1e8856f44a115@nifty.ne.jp> <20240122201602.0a172f5965821f6e8d6afb96@nifty.ne.jp> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 13:41:36 +0100 Message-ID: <877ck1ilq7.fsf@> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate: clean X-purgate-size: 672 X-purgate-ID: 155817::1705927303-F17F942C-A33A6F82/0/0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3030.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, INVALID_MSGID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: ASSI via Cygwin Reply-To: ASSI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com Sender: "Cygwin" Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin writes: > However, I don't find this in the standards. pthread_once is neither > one of the required cancellation points, nor one of the optional > cancellation points. The initializer can be cancellable per POSIX, though: "The pthread_once() function is not a cancellation point. However, if init_routine is a cancellation point and is canceled, the effect on once_control shall be as if pthread_once() was never called." Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple