DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 577643858C62
Message-ID: <0cd75f49-2832-4b17-998f-dfc14977d16d@dronecode.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:05:48 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: liblapack-devel seems to be missing liblapack0 dependency
Content-Language: en-GB
To: airplanemath <airplanemath@aol.com>,
        Marco Atzeri
 <marco.atzeri@gmail.com>,
        The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin@cygwin.com>
References: <c2e1cdaa-a2a3-41a6-a896-b847f3c4ab75.ref@aol.com>
 <c2e1cdaa-a2a3-41a6-a896-b847f3c4ab75@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <c2e1cdaa-a2a3-41a6-a896-b847f3c4ab75@aol.com>
From: Jon Turney via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: Jon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 30/11/2023 20:23, airplanemath via Cygwin wrote:
> To whom it may concern,
> 
> An automated script started failing yesterday, apparently because it 
> could not
> find the lapack and blas DLLs.  On investigation, only liblapack-devel 
> was installed,
> not liblapack0.  Should we be updating scripts to explicitly install 
> liblapack0 when
> using some executable linked with liblapack-devel?
> 

No. I think this was a build error in a recent lapack update.

Marco,

I adjusted this on sourceware.

I think the cygport maybe needs something like 
DEPS_PATH="/usr/lib/lapack/" for the dependency to be automatically 
detected correctly, if libpack0 isn't already installed.


-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple