X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4831C3858402
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1694173038;
	bh=hwEfQWosEG1+GVak/WZy2XntRMMxBre/6nvi9yzCUQQ=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=aLS7GjyEzx1S8iAETTkbyBeiIq45+aOQKtoWIlWb37N2fSi8EnZj8iBHDJwGmtnPZ
	 nmEr+j2UFnTLvUnXee7lQazVT59NhtgPxW0foxRarkKONkdgtFk0sT2uQIzzYqjPua
	 ttzXpDqkOpDRAVaGn0ZzadD3cOtGgkyeggiufgz0=
X-Original-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E787B3858D1E
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694173020; x=1694777820;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=S9oF7F3XUcU9PTPmG82xWVt7yEjx+/W0C5o500n1f1A=;
 b=D94Wf3A+8VyYg/9U7U3KRLGUfuoNSZYop+asnXqpNd9tp84j6TywmXI6zA41y1nJA7
 t7G2mZgZhUuobdvBS2gaZRAG8xUcckrmsA+yA0Z5Zh6cw5+ZeOKXrbM4LRDwvouacVd/
 ui0NSgQRuuWfBAaqlcS8hCfktThmlnwTqaACndeN/Y5JXa7ZV48xp7gx/wqND7Xxsjdk
 Gjr4iRMvi614mQ5FYspgcFgftdHLs46JhgQ823Q9ZYNk1H5R/pKKggVAGuRtD6ccyc0+
 1RyF6xiAI44giC7pdqo4rWEzo1Vo7dEaSqj+50EMhPfDj5g/jt+adccc7l3Xh72OBpRf
 kUOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwRqgolPqu7sFjPeNtRs6cSkzAIhAeYSOJEgBaTuvBN84doOShp
 IwiUC1KRAzZQ7+oVsA+Ysp7HkAw1x9TXtrlgewSIqH3c
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGbUuKTaCE464i1MxLkWLRHNIUL9yc6eC8eWMGe6U0o6hnaVvSULNmGFhAoQKSDU/hU6a5zdYv1/SGbBNL6ERk=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:dac7:0:b0:d7b:8f3c:d7f6 with SMTP id
 n190-20020a25dac7000000b00d7b8f3cd7f6mr2077972ybf.43.1694173020176; Fri, 08
 Sep 2023 04:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANnL4pMrcdfZheDO7_-sR92CtGH5jJVuw=sAJeAtummjhFGqKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZPr8KB/MpdMOe2IL@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <ZPr8KB/MpdMOe2IL@calimero.vinschen.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 07:36:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CANnL4pMk-Y_0hS+z_VzK_Egf4hk2seztJA_b=24iYxf0t=jj2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ARG_MAX missing from getconf
To: cygwin@cygwin.com, Matthew mirage335 Hines <spamfreemirage335@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,
 FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.30
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
From: "Matthew \"mirage335\" Hines via Cygwin" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: "Matthew \"mirage335\" Hines" <spamfreemirage335@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 388BbJhW001167

Ok, I guess that makes sense.

My worry was some './configure' script determining that the build
environment is somehow not 'sane'. At least for the limited set of programs
that I use under cygwin, I have set up my CI to now watch for changes in
which binaries are present. Nothing obviously significant in that history
so far.

At this point, from comparing with my previous CI results, I am guessing
this doesn't affect me, aside from adding an exception to my test case for
this specifically. Might be better to get closer to the usual Linux
behavior I am familiar with, of a much higher, valid, ARG_MAX value.

On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:49 AM Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
wrote:

> On Sep  8 00:14, Matthew "mirage335" Hines via Cygwin wrote:
> > Really hope other Cygwin packages will not be broken because 'ARG_MAX' is
> > now undefined in 'getconf' output. Caught this in a CI test for a rather
> > large shell script.
> >
> >
> https://github.com/mirage335-colossus/ubiquitous_bash/blob/master/structure/installation.sh#L385
>
> Please read this, this is supposed to explain the new ARG_MAX
> behaviour sufficiently:
>
> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2023-August/254352.html
>
>
> Corinna
>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

