X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E416C3858C20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1693232471;
	bh=Dg/hQ9XkwKOxjr7hRPKDOt5IdsClfm0PD2r6qCb6nHI=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=AcRY9wp/KGfiTy6YfqNsRMUYFJ92WE5TbD3JrnQF2uyq7EHidWEkFhR0+kGmDmgES
	 128eof3tlYz7OWcKCAZ1x303M/O4JEM5nTg1pQPLnZCxXR89+x2UpIGDR9YYIoIQ6W
	 kzBSvLPNgvie4UqR/Qqyb03QUrGkpplQPXNVeqXk=
X-Original-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B03FE3858D33
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 23:20:27 +0900
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: scp stalls on uploading in cygwin 3.5 current
 master.
Message-Id: <20230828232027.0b934a4df82a831c454d5419@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR09MB7095A19F19A16FDCABAD03F6A5E0A@DM8PR09MB7095.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20230824060502.c4798062cb19d4d35a5633ae@nifty.ne.jp>
 <20230824123131.390b4471915c963425c77608@nifty.ne.jp>
 <ZOcb9SKtMPTQfj/m@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <20230825174832.9ebae8112667d5d5411cb8db@nifty.ne.jp>
 <ZOiHkCWY7PK3livD@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <20230826042924.53b49a9f8372a9196a151425@nifty.ne.jp>
 <DM8PR09MB70951B220E8E94793560EB8EA5E2A@DM8PR09MB7095.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <20230827084136.3f6ecbfec6aee89508ecb079@nifty.ne.jp>
 <DM8PR09MB7095F5719F77549CBE3E3012A5E0A@DM8PR09MB7095.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
 <20230828224651.c16b295ad5cf10381a5fa47d@nifty.ne.jp>
 <DM8PR09MB7095A19F19A16FDCABAD03F6A5E0A@DM8PR09MB7095.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>

On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 14:07:44 +0000
"Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]" wrote:
> > For message-oriented sockets, a zero-length transport datagram is sent.
> 
> And how is that acceptable?  This will interject a message into some application protocol,
> which may not be expected at the application level.

Yeah, due to these undesired behaviours, we decided not to adopt
this patch. Instead, we reverted the original patch.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple