DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E914D3858CDA
Message-ID: <ca05e9c7-fd8e-0bed-336c-e28c31ea0b27@cs.umass.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 17:33:30 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: posix_spawn_file_actions_add[f]chdir_np
Content-Language: en-US
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <1752276.7aRn1RRit1@nimes> <5022555.upeRZZJTqa@nimes>
 <ZD+lJeaXDZ8V4WWk@calimero.vinschen.de> <1962645.3CdzvNlvnA@nimes>
 <ZEADMM0Ri7NlU/Di@calimero.vinschen.de>
 <ZEA9Z+c64vxuvlC2@calimero.vinschen.de>
In-Reply-To: <ZEA9Z+c64vxuvlC2@calimero.vinschen.de>
From: Eliot Moss via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: moss@cs.umass.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>

A wondering in all this ...

Does having more spawn support imply that bash (for example)
may end up doing faster process spawning, skipping some of
high overhead we've lived with for a long time because of
the Windows process spawning model?

Regards - Eliot Moss

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple