X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Original-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A27703858D3C
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-06.nifty.com 22B99Ttm030929
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.ne.jp;
 s=dec2015msa; t=1646989770;
 bh=iT4O06+xHb5RnJZ/hrE49NNTuhtWbgxD4dOmlPzphzE=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=KknIPTFDntnknDSHbeXPhgO7hAbg2K0K5SSlWLkCuBBqAek6faY7Ml4cyA2HPKGJ1
 wWZLvlvPaKv9xtJX4MuOSPAabgdgStKH/vS1buzIPAmzzSeAEm0P25M3DPD0yWagMJ
 KCUqcX7zoBmhGGDQ/1orkI9DbEjbB6VnkgvXdpkMw1P2T0A4Ehn8m1ipJjH7wd1k39
 vIMAZI/mqvmMXnqfNhv6GT1am3JTPcyVd9uAfAoBpojG2uT9QYWwtaykIVWsAn4Vqv
 5OFGeFvBM8hp8hVCXDooE2CWDkAs2IZPRJdL+YXqkVMREvO6/i1QTr34fCpAZL1HOC
 M6/fQbrGoV48Q==
X-Nifty-SrcIP: [119.150.36.16]
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:09:30 +0900
From: Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Too many level of symbolic links (still have problem with sbmfs
 network drives)
Message-Id: <20220311180930.e0ca6a9bf1b9f0f5c7f9fb5e@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20220309095840.2a1d82b207922c9a4c8badab@nifty.ne.jp>
References: <21ce8733-b5b9-4f04-516a-c674b3cf1162@polymtl.ca>
 <20220305112326.8d07e89f03eb382f58023055@nifty.ne.jp>
 <20220308001455.9da9b8e10b76e9350c22520a@nifty.ne.jp>
 <03fc13d6-55c0-3fd3-87c0-857d026a1d1a@polymtl.ca>
 <20220309085213.6e6a2cf2bf842eb51e9dd0d5@nifty.ne.jp>
 <4bf8ea5a-4afb-e3ee-e177-5dc3053340a4@polymtl.ca>
 <20220309095840.2a1d82b207922c9a4c8badab@nifty.ne.jp>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Philippe Debanne <p.debanne@polymtl.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>

On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:58:40 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:16:29 -0500
> Philippe Debanne wrote:
> > Yes OK, you can send me the DLL, I will test it in the next couple of days.
> 
> Thanks for your cooperation. I have just sent you cygwin1.dll
> for the test. Please test it and let me know the resulted
> debug messages.

I received the debug messages and understood what is happening.
I added a workaround for this issue, so could you please test
the cygwin1.dll with the workaround patch, and let me know the
test result?

I will send you the patched cygwin1.dll shortly.

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi.yano@nifty.ne.jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
