DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F01863857C51
To: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: rename using regexpr - is it possible?
Thread-Topic: rename using regexpr - is it possible?
Thread-Index: AdfIuUOso9jNYEzLT3q4kBenkCDOzgABlNuAAAvY6MAAALCBgAA63rKwABmUzoAAAjfssA==
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:38:38 +0000
Message-ID: <DB6PR03MB3013BCB34A01056A10397F96A4849@DB6PR03MB3013.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DB6PR03MB3013B1F610224113A9D3E761A4829@DB6PR03MB3013.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <1edc0f18-60e9-8769-e931-2875e910cb9e@cs.umass.edu>
 <DB6PR03MB3013A14DF42627BBBDC0C44AA4829@DB6PR03MB3013.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <9b435ec1-7920-4ae4-8867-38913e4bebac@cs.umass.edu>
 <DB6PR03MB30137D43A85F2DAC5A61FFA5A4839@DB6PR03MB3013.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
 <9cd74303-35c2-3d6a-1064-27f1bdf2051b@cs.umass.edu>
In-Reply-To: <9cd74303-35c2-3d6a-1064-27f1bdf2051b@cs.umass.edu>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DB6PR03MB3013.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0d1d5bb7-52ac-449d-39fd-08d998646399
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Oct 2021 09:38:38.4413 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR03MB4010
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,
 FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
From: Fergus Daly via Cygwin <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Reply-To: Fergus Daly <fergusd84@outlook.com>
Cc: Fergus Daly <fergusd84@outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie.com@cygwin.com>

Trivial glitch, indpt of cpan.
Now sorted on both 32 and 64.
Thanks again for all.
(Like you I keep 32 running and uptodate, disregarding dire warnings.
Why? Partly laziness, partly anxiety at loss after so many years' honing.
Also, specifically: it supports wish outside XWin. In 64, Xwin has to be up and running.
Don't like that.) 

-----Original Message-----
From: Eliot Moss <moss@cs.umass.edu> 
Sent: 26 October 2021 09:29
To: Fergus Daly <fergusd84@outlook.com>; 'cygwin@cygwin.com' <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: rename using regexpr - is it possible?

Turns out that my installation that I reported about was for cygwin64.
Given your mail, I tried cygwin32 also (I happen to have both installed, mostly laziness) and the installation went fine for me there, too.  So, yes, must be something about what you had (not) installed, but you're right that now it is hard to tell what is was ...

Best - Eliot

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple