X-Recipient: archive-cygwin@delorie.com
X-Original-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Delivered-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0A3D33857C7F
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=towo.net
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=towo@towo.net
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: {mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-,}gcc-11.1.0-0.1
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
References: <announce.871raewgfm.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
 <f3f9f296-cde2-1549-e7e9-38c1c855d5df@towo.net>
 <0c2f908b-d3ac-5bd6-92b1-c2bd0970ec24@gmail.com>
 <7abf399d-1844-16da-ce49-afe442509ad3@towo.net>
 <20f80861-efa7-5f65-8d70-94fa7793812d@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
From: Thomas Wolff <towo@towo.net>
Message-ID: <71c6c87a-1e5b-14c5-a85c-068fd22f2301@towo.net>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 04:22:40 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20f80861-efa7-5f65-8d70-94fa7793812d@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:NzIx2ChFEc4hyZfbLBle1UqEFIRqRPUIWTCvAjFVEuR6jIdxVB9
 CGB5A032sBeMEuY1fLS8RaTFcqM3b0WNtxcoUVG6itDbS0lx+hAuyxoBQSpLMjJZKSeg5Ls
 Elj2xnXqMUf87/3yCpNwYARLLv8+dmVuISzVaWKPRMfWYEFXS9VCl+IgXzCJ1NDYgL12G3u
 CjUXBbB/ZZYZG3ihzrQHg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:kL90tDdMlKA=:2gMBNGuqow+PRatygBFZWx
 CW9i7BHnrWd44d6sksrF3ZKfMATFK28cHGcnwdqOGBnZ3b2vL1DXcbMJnDpLUt0jc/X5qCkOp
 ijfNcvcq0X/S/PUMj+SpGNTANbuMOJ/VdccloFzY19nN8Z7EXKKBZDqBXHllv0uIcZr1TDGa5
 dSi4BAbfg8BW1WQAUihqtDSn+A/+/Olmldg9PuwQF1xK+hmmFJLTl8eJF9+VtYWLZxfQae56Z
 hSYSR1vRHvUqNQ8hSMao1Nr8ufM4fVFlDTfE7CWN8fR1LxCH2Glfa/0HCM0/h4ji6qUPberlk
 YRd9JVX98LeP6tkC1N8X5P8J5QZC1ibqbbLz+uNKnVhHWsdHlv1LqpFmmLTNmtvySaJiBaLPI
 a+ODpgv5oKI/swJewYxS5Ni/51M9vKWI6q0XSJId5l87Xz6n/x2EB94G15HMTmw0KPRKDiqU4
 DBFaeyRBBQnsiUqWzCXbC868T121xA8pVv+YQo2xGZi4SYzr7QGfOg9FWU8SErYeIINf1q38x
 Zf5F+47frEtW5D2kLDDAfo=
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces@cygwin.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 14D2MmeF000981


Am 13.05.2021 um 03:41 schrieb Brian Inglis:
>
> On 2021-05-12 12:30, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>> Am 12.05.2021 um 12:42 schrieb Jonathan Yong via Cygwin:
>>> On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>>>> Am 10.05.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Achim Gratz:
>>>>> The native and mingw-w64 cross compilers have been updated for both
>>>>> architectures to the latest upstream release version:
>>>>>   gcc-11.1.0-0.1
>
>>>> Are there any known problems with gcc 11? My program crashes if 
>>>> compiled with gcc -O2; gcc -O1 works, gcc 10 also works.
> Do you mean that building mintty with gcc 11 -O2 breaks mintty?
No, this is actually about another program, my text editor mined (just 
migrating to github).

>
>>>>>   mingw64-i686-gcc-11.1.0-0.1
>>>>>   mingw64-x86_64-gcc-11.1.0-0.1
>>>>>
>>>>> This test release includes libgccjit as a separate package for the
>>>>> native toolchain on both architectures.  Since Cygwin can't use 
>>>>> ASLR any
>>>>> nontrivial dynamic objects that get created in this way will 
>>>>> likely need
>>>>> to get rebased before they can be used (especially on 32bit). It is
>>>>> unlikely that build systems recognize the need for doing that at the
>>>>> moment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please test these compilers with your packages and applications as
>>>>> extensively as possible (especially if you are a Cygwin package
>>>>> maintainer).  Unless problems are found that necessitate another 
>>>>> round
>>>>> of testing, the plan is to bootstrap the support libraries with 
>>>>> the new
>>>>> toolchain and do a non-test update in about two to four weeks.
>
>>> Does stripping the optimized executable fix things?
>
>> No
>
>>> Are you also able to produce a minimal test case? 
>
>> Hardly. Behaviour is totally erratic. If I let the stacktrace tell me 
>> where it crashed and make the function empty, it happens somewhere 
>> else...


-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

